| Several journalists were induced to write antagonistic stories about Michael Jackson, particularly, former vile Fox News gossip columnist, Roger Friedman, who was fired over his unwise choices in the “Wolverine” film leak scandal. He wrote nagging, nasty articles, regularly proclaiming in a mean manner that Jackson was about to lose his home to foreclosure and his music publishing catalog, he’d borrowed money against. He kept proclaiming Jackson’s ruination was impending and of the greatest proportions. Friedman and others, prompted by individuals that sought to take Jackson’s assets, through an unlawful plot, did this to relentlessly goad, upset, vex and worry the pop singer, into abandoning all that he had worked for since childhood and purchased with his own earnings. As the world now knows, the immense pressure from the court circuit and the press, caused Jackson great anxiety, which begat insomnia. To address what clearly became a nervous disorder, Jackson turned to prescription meds in large doses, leading to his demise this past summer at the age of 49. Hollywood has more scammers and con artists than any other industry in the nation and world. People in tinseltown routinely conspire to bring others down to criminally steal millions and sometimes billions of dollars in cash and assets. Bribes are often paid to those willing to set people up and make false accusations that deteriorate victims’ financial position, enabling industry sharks to move in on their prey. Frivolous litigation is often initiated directly and or indirectly through third parties, in an effort to financially weaken, distress and psychologically batter targets chosen for their valuable assets. It is as bad the mafia, but worse in some ways, with both entities not above resorting to murder to get what they want. |
Sabtu, 24 Oktober 2009
When Ink Turns To Blood
Rabu, 26 Agustus 2009
Model Sues Google For Releasing Identity
A model, Liskula Cohen, sued Google to obtain the information of an anonymous blogger that badmouthed her online, calling her a "skank" who didn't care about her hygiene.

A skank? No!
Google, complying with the court order, released the name of the blogger behind “Skanks of NYC." It turned out to be another model, Rosemary Port, who was angry with Liskula Cohen, for telling her boyfriend stories about her, she alleges to be untrue. Retract the claws ladies.

Rosemary Port
Rosemary Port, is now suing Google for $15,000,000 for outing her. Under the "terms of service" one agrees to when starting a blog with just about any company, it is disclosed they can turn your information over under court order.

You really would have no legal grounds to sue Google or any other companies in their genre, for outing you under such circumstances, as they are shielded under specific laws governing the internet and you did not prove your comments were truthful and not defamatory, as alleged.

You did not demonstrate they violated your civil rights in any manner, by discriminating against you or inappropriately denying you access to services other citizens are entitled to under the law.
You were accused of defaming someone. Your first hurdle was to actually prove you did not defame Liskula Cohen. But you have not demonstrated that.

Once again, why would Google or any other company defy a court order under such circumstances, to protect your identity, because you didn't have the guts to publicly state your incendiary views on another model.
Free Speech and Freedom of the Press cover a number of things. However, if you actually defame someone, you can be sued in civil court. The Constitution does not indemnify you from defamation suits.
